Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:04
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Five dead in latest Israeli shootings of Gazans seeking aid, say local officials - Financial Times
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Google adds AI features to Chromebook Plus devices - TechCrunch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Superbugs thrive as access to antibiotics fails in India - BBC
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How do you make a karaoke version of a song?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.